

Compare any two college prospects head-to-head. Pick two players, or jump into a featured matchup.
2027 NFL Draft
Decker DeGraaf vs Michael Masunas
Washington Huskies
TE · #86Texas Longhorns
TE · #15| Decker DeGraaf | Statistic | Michael Masunas |
|---|---|---|
| Leading value: 32 | Receptions | 19 |
| Leading value: 360 | Receiving Yards | 232 |
| 2 | Receiving TDs | 3 (leading value) |
| Decker DeGraaf | Statistic | Michael Masunas |
|---|---|---|
| 6-4 | Height | 6-5 |
| 250 lb | Weight | 259 lb |
| Decker DeGraaf | Statistic | Michael Masunas |
|---|---|---|
| #268 | Fanspeak rank | #247 (leading value) |
| TE 16 | Position rank | TE 15 (leading value) |
| Leading value: 235.7 | Average pick | 242.4 |
| 105 | Times drafted | 286 (leading value) |
| Leading value: 31 | Hype Score | 18 |
| Most drafted to |
Latest shared season where available.
✓ Leading recorded value · — Unavailable
Dean Kindig
2025: Played in all 13 games, starting 11. Caught four passes for 20 yards in the opener vs. Colorado State. Started vs. UC Davis, finishing with a six-yard catch. Started at Washington State. Two catches for 24 yards vs. Ohio State, when he also recovered a fumble on punt coverage. Career-high six receptions for 62 yards in the win at Maryland. Two catches for 39 yards in the win over Rutgers. Four receptions for 26 yards at Michigan. Two catches for 13 yards and a TD in the win over No. 23 Illinois. Led the team with five receptions for 91 yards in the win over Purdue. Three catches for 46 yards and a touchdown in the win at UCLA. Two catches for 26 yards vs. Oregon. Had one catch in the Huskies' L. A. Bowl win over Boise State.
Full player profileDean Kindig
1-21 (21.0) 1 TD vs Mich. 4 years, 12 starts at Mich State, transfers to TX 01-02-26. 19 of 22 targets caught in '25. Starter in 2TE Sets in 25-Future Starter 2026.
Full player profileDecker DeGraaf and Michael Masunas are compared using 2027 Fanspeak Consensus rankings, 2025 college production from their player profiles, On The Clock draft activity, and creator scouting reports.
Lower consensus ranks and average picks indicate earlier draft projections. Missing values remain unavailable. Measurements and cross-position production are shown without winner labels. Change either player to open another shareable matchup.