

Compare any two college prospects head-to-head. Pick two players, or jump into a featured matchup.
2027 NFL Draft
Jeremiah Hasley vs Peter Clarke
Duke Blue Devils
TE · #85Temple Owls
TE · #0| Jeremiah Hasley | Statistic | Peter Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Leading value: 40 | Receptions | 30 |
| 454 | Receiving Yards | 483 (leading value) |
| 6 | Receiving TDs | 6 |
| Jeremiah Hasley | Statistic | Peter Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| 6-3 | Height | 6-6 |
| 250 lb | Weight | 265 lb |
| Jeremiah Hasley | Statistic | Peter Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| #199 | Fanspeak rank | #95 (leading value) |
| TE 10 | Position rank | TE 4 (leading value) |
| 229.3 | Average pick | 132.5 (leading value) |
| 1,152 | Times drafted | 1,985 (leading value) |
| 43 | Hype Score | 62 (leading value) |
| Most drafted to |
Latest shared season where available.
✓ Leading recorded value · — Unavailable
Dean Kindig
4-43 (10.8) vs NCState. Surprising contributor in the Duke offense last year. Hauling in 40 catches for 454 yards and 6 TDs. When Hasley first arrived in Durham for the 2022 season, he committed as a linebacker. Because he practiced on the defensive side of the ball, he worked in the exact same defensive meetings and drills as DeWayne Carter during 2022 and most of the 2023 season. Carter was already an established star and a three-time team captain, serving as a major locker room mentor for younger defensive players like Hasley. Toward the end of the 2023 fall season—their final year together—Hasley transitioned from linebacker to tight end.
Full player profileDean Kindig
Most yards per route run among FBS TEs (min. 50 routes run), their highest-graded TE. London, England born already has 13/181 (18.38) so far this season, great size. PFF ranked top 3 TE blocking grade. G5 all American. Set a few school TE receiving records this year.
Full player profileJeremiah Hasley and Peter Clarke are compared using 2027 Fanspeak Consensus rankings, 2025 college production from their player profiles, On The Clock draft activity, and creator scouting reports.
Lower consensus ranks and average picks indicate earlier draft projections. Missing values remain unavailable. Measurements and cross-position production are shown without winner labels. Change either player to open another shareable matchup.