

Compare any two college prospects head-to-head. Pick two players, or jump into a featured matchup.
2027 NFL Draft
Jayden Jackson vs A.J. Holmes Jr.
Oklahoma Sooners
DT · #65Texas Tech Red Raiders
DT · #10| Jayden Jackson | Statistic | A.J. Holmes Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | Tackles | 40 (leading value) |
| 3.0 | Sacks | 4.5 (leading value) |
| 5.0 | Tackles for Loss | 10.0 (leading value) |
| 0 | Passes Defended | 4 (leading value) |
| Jayden Jackson | Statistic | A.J. Holmes Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| 6-2 | Height | 6-3 |
| 310 lb | Weight | 300 lb |
| Jayden Jackson | Statistic | A.J. Holmes Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| #99 | Fanspeak rank | #47 (leading value) |
| DT 9 | Position rank | DT 6 (leading value) |
| 115.9 | Average pick | 63.6 (leading value) |
| 1,866 | Times drafted | 2,151 (leading value) |
| 67 | Hype Score | 71 (leading value) |
| Most drafted to |
Latest shared season where available.
✓ Leading recorded value · — Unavailable
Dean Kindig
Two total tackles and 0.5 sacks (PFF 71) vs Mich; heavily limited (only 12 snaps) by an injury vs Alabama; three total tackles vs Mizzou, effective vs run game. Hank: "good flashes all over his tape but needs to find consistency"
Full player profileDean Kindig
Enters his final collegiate season among the highest-rated returning interior defensive linemen in the country. His 84.8 overall grade as a junior ranks third at his position group, trailing only Colorado's EzraChristensen (previously at New Mexico State) and Auburn's Cody Sigler (previously at Arkansas State). Will switch to jersey No. 10 for his final season as a Red Raider. @IC_Draft: "impressed me a ton on film. All-American in '25. 4.5 sacks, 9 TFLs, 84.3 PFN DT Impact grade. Average size, but elite explosive capacity, great size-adjusted power, relentless motor. Love his fit in penetrating, one-gapping schemes."
Full player profileJayden Jackson and A.J. Holmes Jr. are compared using 2027 Fanspeak Consensus rankings, 2025 college production from their player profiles, On The Clock draft activity, and creator scouting reports.
Lower consensus ranks and average picks indicate earlier draft projections. Missing values remain unavailable. Measurements and cross-position production are shown without winner labels. Change either player to open another shareable matchup.